Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/13/1996
State v. Eaton
Citations
- 919 P.2d 116
- 82 Wash. App. 723
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting State’s contention that the Supreme Court abrogated the merger doctrine in Calle; declining to assume that the court intended to abrogate the doctrine without mentioning it at all
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Agid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court· 1998-06-04· cited 204×
- State v. FrohsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-10-14· cited 61×
- State v. NystaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-05-07· cited 52×
- State v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-15· cited 50×
- State v. PastranaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-03-05· cited 27×
- State v. PastranaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-21· cited 23×
- State v. DeRykeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-03-11· cited 22×
- State v. RilesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-28· cited 18×
- State v. AronhaltCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-02-22· cited 11×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-03-11· cited 8×
- State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-05-06· cited 8×
- State v. LuCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-03-05· cited 7×
- State v. L.U.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-03-05· cited 7×
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-12-20· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court· 1995-01-26· cited 348×
- State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court· 1983-04-28· cited 258×
- Kish v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWashington Supreme Court· 1994-11-03· cited 97×
- In Re the Welfare of WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 1979-01-05· cited 70×
- State v. GalisiaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-01-21· cited 53×
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-04-08· cited 49×
- State v. BirgenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-09-20· cited 28×
- State v. McJimpsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-09-05· cited 28×
- State v. SlemmerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-02· cited 25×
- ETCO, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-06· cited 25×
- State v. LanglandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-12-12· cited 18×
- State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-20· cited 12×
- State v. PortomeneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-11-27· cited 10×
- State v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-11-29· cited 9×
- State v. LiraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-10-13· cited 7×
- State v. LittsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-04-06· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.