State v. Lingwall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding factual findings were not necessary to support a 180-day sentence
• vacating two of three sentences where “there was not a sufficient break in [defendant’s] conduct to make it separate behavioral incidents”
• vacating two of three sentences where \there was not a sufficient break in [defendant's] conduct to make it separate behavioral incidents\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-29· cited 21×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-11-26· cited 11×
• United States v. Lawrence Murphy, United States of America v. Lawrence Murphy
  Fourth Circuit· 2003-04-16· cited 10×
• Brandon Mockbee v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-07-19· cited 6×
• State v. Bertsch
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-11-30· cited 5×
• State v. North
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-05-01· cited 3×
• State v. Schloegl
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-05-07
• State of Minnesota v. Blair Benedict Oberton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-07-31

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cooke v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 880×
• State v. Webb
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-05-26· cited 349×
• State v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-12· cited 128×
• State v. Bookwalter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-12-08· cited 63×
• State v. Tatum
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-11-21· cited 14×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-07-13· cited 14×
• State v. Wagner
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-11-05· cited 14×
• People of Detroit v. Warriner
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-02-19· cited 12×
• State v. Jeter
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-01-21· cited 3×