Skip to main content
· 12/26/2001

State v. Lingwall

Citations

  • 637 N.W.2d 311
  • 2001 Minn. App. LEXIS 1404
  • 2001 WL 1646415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding factual findings were not necessary to support a 180-day sentence
  • vacating two of three sentences where “there was not a sufficient break in [defendant’s] conduct to make it separate behavioral incidents”
  • vacating two of three sentences where \there was not a sufficient break in [defendant's] conduct to make it separate behavioral incidents\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toussaint, Anderson, Mulally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.