Hawaii Supreme Court· 11/1/1994

State v. Lindsey

Citations

883 P.2d 83
77 Haw. 162
1994 Haw. LEXIS 85

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting the presumption that this jurisdiction will not recognize the right to a jury trial where the maximum term of imprisonment is less than thirty days
noting the presumption that this jurisdiction will not recognize the right to a jury trial where the maximum term of imprisonment is less than thirty days
noting the presumption that this jurisdiction will not recognize the right to a jury trial where the maximum term of imprisonment is less than thirty days
“the legislature was concerned primarily not with prostitution itself but with the secondary effects of prostitution” (citation omitted)
in considering the penalty for prostitution, which includes a maximum thirty days in jail, “$500 fine is insufficient in and of itself to trigger the right to a jury trial” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, C.J., and Klein, Levinson, Nakayama and Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.