· 4/11/1988
State v. Mun Chung Tom
Citations
- 752 P.2d 597
- 69 Haw. 602
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that allowing deferred pleas for an offense could be inconsistent with a conclusion that the offense is serious
- affirming the trial court's denial of a deferred acceptance of no contest (DANC
- affirming the trial court’s denial of a deferred acceptance of no contest (DANC
- analogizing the language of the driving under the influence (DUI) statute to the wording of the prostitution statute, infra, and noting that “the language of the DUI statute [(ie., a person convicted ‘shall be sentenced as follows without possibility of probation’
- analogizing the language of the driving under the influence (DUI) statute to the wording of the prostitution statute, infra, and noting that “the language of the DUI statute [ (i.e., a person convicted ‘shall be sentenced as follows without possibility of probation’
- \The grant or denial of a motion for a DANC ... plea is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed unless there has been manifest abuse of discretion.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.