Skip to main content
· 4/11/1988

State v. Mun Chung Tom

Citations

  • 752 P.2d 597
  • 69 Haw. 602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that allowing deferred pleas for an offense could be inconsistent with a conclusion that the offense is serious
  • affirming the trial court's denial of a deferred acceptance of no contest (DANC
  • affirming the trial court’s denial of a deferred acceptance of no contest (DANC
  • analogizing the language of the driving under the influence (DUI) statute to the wording of the prostitution statute, infra, and noting that “the language of the DUI statute [(ie., a person convicted ‘shall be sentenced as follows without possibility of probation’
  • analogizing the language of the driving under the influence (DUI) statute to the wording of the prostitution statute, infra, and noting that “the language of the DUI statute [ (i.e., a person convicted ‘shall be sentenced as follows without possibility of probation’
  • \The grant or denial of a motion for a DANC ... plea is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed unless there has been manifest abuse of discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.