Nesbitt v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the caption failed to include both the measure’s subjects
• stating that court should not engage in “speculation” or “an inappropriate factual investigation”
• stating that court should not engage in \speculation\ or \an inappropriate factual investigation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kain v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-11-06· cited 20×
• Pelikan v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-02-23· cited 15×
• Terhune v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-03-23· cited 13×
• State v. Licari
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-26· cited 10×
• State v. Rettmann
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-20· cited 8×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Phillips v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-05-02· cited 19×
• Witt v. Kulongoski
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-03· cited 16×
• Sizemore v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-12-26· cited 8×