Skip to main content

State v. Lewis

Citations

  • 797 A.2d 1198
  • 2002 WL 1009816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that denial of motion for sentence reduction is reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • reviewing the Superior Court’s exercise of authority under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(b) for abuse of discretion
  • Commenting on limited nature of Rule 35 and noting that it is obviously not meant to “leave open any sentence for reconsideration indefinitely.”
  • Commenting on limited nature of Rule 35 and noting that it is obviously not meant to “leave open any sentence for reconsideration indefinitely.”
  • “When this Court removes the thoughtful, rational time bar Superior Court has written into its rule, we force the Superior Court to consider each Rule 35(b
  • A canon of statutory interpretation may be “equally applicable to an interpretation of a court rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland, Berger, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.