Supreme Court of Delaware· 10/27/1983
Solis v. Tea
Citations
- 468 A.2d 1276
- 1983 Del. LEXIS 507
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Family Court may reform a parent’s contractual obligation for child support upon an appropriate showing. We refused to interpreted section 1519(a)(4
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herrmann, Horsey, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Powell v. Department of Services for Children, Youth & Their FamiliesSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-12-23· cited 115×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 2002-05-20· cited 90×
- Mundy v. DevonSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-04-06· cited 78×
- Jones v. LangSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-04-12· cited 53×
- In re the Adoption of Infant ShermanSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2008-06-02· cited 35×
- Casa v. Department of Services for Children, Youth & Their FamiliesSupreme Court of Delaware· 2003-10-07· cited 33×
- Long v. Division of Family ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware· 2012-04-03· cited 26×
- Ramon v. RamonSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-12-23· cited 22×
- Stewart v. StewartSupreme Court of Delaware· 2012-03-15· cited 11×
- Smith v. GordonSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-02-03· cited 11×
- Tribbitt v. TribbittSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-12-23· cited 10×
- Friant v. FriantSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-02-02· cited 9×
- Olsen v. OlsenSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-04-28· cited 9×
- William R.T. v. Bonnie R.T.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-04-25· cited 9×
- Brown v. Division of Family ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-03-03· cited 7×
- Stewart v. Department of Services for Children, Youth, & Their FamiliesSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-03-16· cited 5×
- Sentner v. SentnerSupreme Court of Delaware· 2002-05-31· cited 5×
- Holmes v. WooleySuperior Court of Delaware· 2001-11-02· cited 4×
- Shuba v. Division of Child Support Enforcement Ex Rel. ReeseSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-08-16· cited 3×
- Division of Family Services v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-10-28· cited 3×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wife (J. F. v. v. Husband (O. W. v. Jr.)Supreme Court of Delaware· 1979-05-18· cited 170×
- Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-03-03· cited 112×
- Knox v. RemickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-12-08· cited 102×
- Jensen v. JensenMontana Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 41×
- Stancill v. StancillCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-01-08· cited 38×
- In Re Two Minor ChildrenSupreme Court of Delaware· 1961-07-07· cited 29×
- Cleveland v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-07-09· cited 28×
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-07-30· cited 24×
- Ebel v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals· 1976-08-24· cited 19×
- Lizotte v. LizotteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-06-14· cited 16×
- Wife, B. T. L. v. Husband, H. A. L.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1972-02-02· cited 15×
- Masse v. MasseSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1974-01-11· cited 14×
- Gulley Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. GulleyUtah Supreme Court· 1977-09-30· cited 13×
- Bria v. BriaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 13×
- In re C. M. D.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1969-06-24· cited 13×
- Dumel v. DumelCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1965-10-14· cited 12×
- Husband, J. v. Wife, J.Delaware Family Court· 1979-12-18· cited 11×
- Harry M. P. v. Nina M. P.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1981-11-02· cited 10×
- Husband L. v. Wife L.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1975-04-08· cited 10×
- Alves v. AlvesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-10-31· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.