· 2/21/1986
State v. Grotzky
Citations
- 382 N.W.2d 20
- 222 Neb. 39
- 1986 Neb. LEXIS 857
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “excessive intoxication” is not available as a defense to drunk driving because criminal intent is not necessary to prove the charge
- North Dakota statute providing penalty for driving while license is suspended or revoked does not contain a mental culpability requirement.
- an element of criminal intent is not a part of the proof under statute prohibiting operating or actual physical control of vehicle while under influence of alcohol where statutory language did not include intent element
- felony of operating motor vehicle after license revoked does not require intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.