Skip to main content
· 2/21/1986

State v. Grotzky

Citations

  • 382 N.W.2d 20
  • 222 Neb. 39
  • 1986 Neb. LEXIS 857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “excessive intoxication” is not available as a defense to drunk driving because criminal intent is not necessary to prove the charge
  • North Dakota statute providing penalty for driving while license is suspended or revoked does not contain a mental culpability requirement.
  • an element of criminal intent is not a part of the proof under statute prohibiting operating or actual physical control of vehicle while under influence of alcohol where statutory language did not include intent element
  • felony of operating motor vehicle after license revoked does not require intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.