United States v. Valerie Terrigno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the indictment’s reference to the defendant’s issuing checks “willfully” was relevant because the government sought to prove that fact
• holding that the indictment’s refer- ence to the defendant’s issuing checks “willfully” was rele- vant because the government sought to prove that fact
• holding that 26 probation conditions are narrowly drawn when they “protect the public from a situation 27 that might lead to a repetition of the same crime.”
• holding that when fundamental rights are affected, “[t]he 5 test for validity of probation conditions is whether the conditions are primarily designed to 6 meet the ends of rehabilitation and protection of the public.”
• upholding probation condition that defendant not speak for money about her crime, even though it infringed on her right to free speech, because it was reasonably related to her rehabilitation
• upholding probation condition that defendant not speak for money about her crime, even though it infringed on her right to free speech, because it was reasonably related to her rehabilitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).