State v. LePage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining claim preclusion would apply only to the extent a party is raising the same claim for a second time
• to the extent claims of error were addressed on direct appeal, “they are barred by the doctrine of res judicata”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Knutsen v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2007-05-02· cited 245×
• State v. Timothy Alan Dunlap
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2013-08-27· cited 191×
• State v. Azad Haji Abdullah
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2015-03-02· cited 106×
• Hall v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2011-05-27· cited 19×
• State v. Dempsey
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2008-07-07· cited 9×
• Dominguez Ex Rel. Hamp v. Elias (In Re Elias)
  D. Idaho· 2003-12-19· cited 9×
• Hall v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-06-22· cited 6×
• Christopher Ray Schultz
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2012-11-21· cited 5×
• Lepage v. Idaho
  Supreme Court· 2003-10-20
• Christopher Ray Schultz v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2012-11-21
• Daniel Lee Eby v. State of Idaho
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-05-15
• Larry Severson v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-10-10
• State v. Donk
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2007-09-26
• Hall v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2023-03-22