Knutsen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a challenge to the length of a sentence could be raised on direct appeal and is therefore not appropriate in a post-conviction proceeding
• noting that conditions of confinement claims are properly brought in a habeas corpus action or perhaps a post-conviction case, but not on direct appeal
• requiring showing of reasonable probability proceedings’ outcome would have been different to establish prejudice
• considering the applicable legal standard to determine when res judicata applies
• pursuant to I.C. § 19-4901(b), declining to consider claim that could have been raised on direct appeal
• “The principles of res judicata apply when an applicant attempts to raise the same issues previously ruled upon on direct appeal in a subsequent application for post-conviction relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).