Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/18/2007
State v. Lemieux
Citations
- 726 N.W.2d 783
- 2007 Minn. LEXIS 14
- 2007 WL 113952
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that officers lawfully entered a residence while investigating a homicide, after being told that someone was in the residence that night and observing that a screen window had been torn, the window was open, and the door was unlatched
- holding warrantless entry of residence was justified by need to search for intruders or injured occupants
- stating that an objectively reasonable emergency is necessary to justify the emergency-aid exception for a warrantless search conducted during a criminal investigation
- stating that an objectively reasonable emergency is necessary to justify the emergency-aid exception for a warrantless search conducted during a criminal investigation
- stating that, under Brigham City, an officer’s subjective intent is not relevant to the emergency-aid exception under the Fourth Amendment
- observing that, depending on the facts, burglary can be considered a \person offense\ as opposed to a \property offense\ for the purpose of calculating sentences under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Russell, Meyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-03-30· cited 184×
- Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-22· cited 72×
- State v. DeneuiSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-11-10· cited 50×
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-12-06· cited 33×
- State v. ZornesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-31· cited 30×
- State v. SpenceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-07-16· cited 17×
- State v. MorinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-06-26· cited 9×
- State v. JacotCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-07-17· cited 7×
- Ries v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-12-05· cited 7×
- STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kyle Dean McCLAIN, AppellantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-05-05· cited 3×
- In Re the Welfare of J.W.L.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-06-05· cited 1×
- Justin Stephen Ries v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-12-19· cited 1×
- State v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-04-22
- Lum v. KolesAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-09-21
- State of Minnesota v. Renee Zhoushkogeshig GaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2026-05-11
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 2,237×
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-03-06· cited 1,325×
- Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court· 1992-12-08· cited 1,151×
- Lewis L. Wayne v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1963-04-04· cited 479×
- People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-04-06· cited 458×
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-13· cited 183×
- United States v. TiboltFirst Circuit· 1995-12-29· cited 148×
- State v. JuarezSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-12-18· cited 141×
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-06-17· cited 136×
- Helen Frances Sutton Root v. Isabel H. GauperEighth Circuit· 1971-02-25· cited 124×
- United States v. Hector Morales Cervantes, AKA Benito C. CarilloNinth Circuit· 2000-06-12· cited 115×
- United States v. Kenneth R. LenoirSeventh Circuit· 2003-02-26· cited 112×
- In Re Sealed Case 96-3167D.C. Circuit· 1998-09-04· cited 81×
- United States v. Bryan A. MossFourth Circuit· 1992-05-01· cited 78×
- State v. BradfordSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-10-25· cited 78×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.