Supreme Court of Louisiana· 7/1/2009
In Re Matter Under Investigation
Citations
- 15 So. 3d 972
- 2009 WL 1875690
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “finding that criminal litigation is reasonably anticipated would resolve the case”
- “Everything in the file can be said to pertain to criminal litigation.”
- “a motion for return of property filed pursuant to La. R.S. 15:41 is part and parcel of a criminal proceeding”
- “a motion for return of property filed pursuant to La. R.S. 15:41 is part and parcel of a criminal proceeding”
- “a motion for return of property filed pursuant to La. R.S. 15:41 is part and parcel of a criminal proceeding”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- William Henry Shane v. the Parish of Jefferson, State of Louisiana, and the Jefferson Parish Economic Development CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2015-12-08· cited 25×
- Maldonado v. CannizzaroLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2018-10-10· cited 11×
- Errol Houston, Jr. v. New Orleans CityFifth Circuit· 2012-03-14· cited 9×
- New Orleans Bulldog Society v. Louisiana Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2017-05-03· cited 7×
- Mercato Elisio, L.L.C. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2018-11-21· cited 6×
- Independent Weekly, LLC v. PopeLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2016-09-28· cited 5×
- Brown v. SerpasLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-03-20· cited 4×
- Does v. FotiLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2011-12-08· cited 4×
- Lens v. LandrieuLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2016-12-14· cited 3×
- McKay v. State, Division AdministrationLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-03-21· cited 2×
- Shane v. Parish of JeffersonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-09-24· cited 2×
- Errol Houston, Jr. v. New Orleans CityFifth Circuit· 2012-03-15· cited 1×
- Posner v. GautreauxLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2016-03-03· cited 1×
- Louisiana Capital Assistance Center v. RileyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2010-12-15· cited 1×
- Pardee v. ConnickLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2019-03-15
- Muhammad v. Office of the Dist. Attorney for the Parish of St. JamesLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2019-06-19
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 3,484×
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 1,503×
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 1,412×
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court· 1946-02-11· cited 1,024×
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1925-10-05· cited 910×
- United States v. MaraSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 379×
- Becker v. KrollTenth Circuit· 2007-07-19· cited 288×
- Touchard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-04-12· cited 221×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2008-01-16· cited 173×
- United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.Supreme Court· 1949-05-09· cited 165×
- Title Research Corp. v. RauschSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1984-04-02· cited 118×
- Boudreaux v. STATE, DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2002-02-26· cited 117×
- Donovan v. Lone Steer, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-01-17· cited 112×
- Landis v. MoreauSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-02-21· cited 74×
- In Re: Subpoena Duces Tecum United States of America v. Dwight L. Bailey, M.D. Family Health Care Associates of Southwest Virginia, PcFourth Circuit· 2000-09-08· cited 65×
- State v. PasterSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-06-25· cited 61×
- In Re MelanconSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2006-07-10· cited 53×
- Capital City Press v. Metro. CouncilSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1997-07-01· cited 49×
- In Re: Administrative Subpoena John Doe, D.P.M. v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2001-06-14· cited 30×
Other cases named In Re Matter Under Investigation
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.