State v. Kidd
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 3167
Syllabus
Appellant's aggregate sentence of ten years for operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (\OVI\) with a repeat OVI offender specification was not contrary to law. The court properly considered the statutory guidelines and factors, and it did not err in considering information in the presentence investigation report that a petition for a protection order was pending against appellant. Appellant mischaracterizes the record in asserting that the court treated his alcoholism as \willful disobedience\; the trial court correctly noted appellant's numerous failed efforts at rehabilitation and his ongoing inability to control his alcohol consumption. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. DorseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-15· cited 137×
- State v. BowserOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-03-12· cited 106×
- State v. WorthenOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-13· cited 45×
- State v. FarraOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-29· cited 39×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-20· cited 36×
- State v. AnthonyOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-31· cited 24×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-19· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.