New Mexico Supreme Court· 10/17/1980
State v. Larson
Citations
- 617 P.2d 1310
- 94 N.M. 795
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a statute is not unconstitutionally vague just because some marginal cases could be hypothesized in which doubts might arise
- stating that a statute is not unconstitutionally vague just because some marginal cases could be hypothesized in which doubts might arise
- stating that a statute 9 is not unconstitutionally vague just because some marginal cases could be 10 hypothesized in which doubts might arise
- “We do not in any way believe that a person of ordinary intelligence would not understand which type of conduct is proscribed in Section 30-9-11 [criminal sexual penetration].”
- if person consenting has common authority over premises, consent to search is valid
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sosa, Easley, Payne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DuffyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-05-20· cited 205×
- State v. OsborneNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 149×
- State v. ParishNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-07-11· cited 137×
- State v. PierceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-05-17· cited 89×
- State v. ReedWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-03-17· cited 37×
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-09-11· cited 30×
- State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-02-23· cited 28×
- State v. RamosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-06-27· cited 18×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-11-09· cited 8×
- People v. MasselliNew York Supreme Court· 1987-01-20· cited 2×
- State v. RamosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-07-01
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 1,862×
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 938×
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 896×
- State v. FerrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-09-19· cited 31×
- United States v. Wallace Jerome MooreThird Circuit· 1972-09-12· cited 28×
- State v. MadridNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-01-03· cited 17×
- Territory of New Mexico v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1907-02-25· cited 13×
- In Re United States of America, United States of America v. Salvatore J. CannatellaSecond Circuit· 1979-04-11· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.