Tennessee Supreme Court· 3/8/1999

State v. Curry

Citations

988 S.W.2d 153
1999 Tenn. LEXIS 128
1999 WL 115113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that in reviewing the denial of diversion, the trial court is limited to the evidence considered by the prosecutor
holding that in reviewing the denial of diversion, the trial court is limited to the evidence considered by the prosecutor
stating that in deciding whether to grant pretrial diversion, focus should be on defendant’s amenability to correction
“[W]hether to grant pretrial diversion to a qualified defendant who is statutorily eligible is a determination that lies in the discretion of the district attorney general.”
“[W]hether to grant pretrial diversion to a qualified defendant who is statutorily eligible is a determination that lies in the discretion of the district attorney general.”
“[W]hether to grant pretrial diversion to a qualified defendant who is statutorily eligible is a determination that lies in the discretion of the district attorney general.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice E. Riley Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.