Skip to main content

State v. Lafferty

Citations

  • 309 A.2d 647
  • 1973 Me. LEXIS 344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that an insignificant break (“missing link”) in the chain of custody of certain physical evidence (blood samples in Lafferty) makes the evidence per se inadmissible
  • no showing of break in continuity unless use of the mails can be so characterized
  • as stated for the Court in the concurring opinion of Wernick, J.
  • evidence sent through the mails and received by the correct addressee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weatherbee, Pomeroy, Wernick, Archibald, Dufresne, Webber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.