Hawaii Supreme Court· 1/12/1996

State v. Knight

Citations

909 P.2d 1133
80 Haw. 318
1996 Haw. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that it was in the “interest of justice” to address the merits of the defendant’s appeal notwithstanding the untimely filing of the notice of appeal
holding that it was in the \interest of justice\ to address the merits of the defendant's appeal notwithstanding the untimely filing of the notice of appeal
declining to dismiss the appeal “[i]n the interest of justice” because, “[n]ot-withstanding counsel’s failure to comply with the time requirements of HRAP Rule 4(b
declining to dismiss defendant’s appeal in the interest of justice notwithstanding counsel’s failure to timely file a notice of appeal
declining to dismiss a criminal defendant's late-filed appeal and addressing the merits \[i]n the interest of justice\
applying Erwin to a criminal case without reference to whether the defendant was “indigent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Klein, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.