Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/17/1977

State v. Henderson

Citations

569 P.2d 252
116 Ariz. 310
1977 Ariz. App. LEXIS 706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

inferring consent to a mistrial when defense counsel “actively participated” and had “every opportunity” to object but did not do so
lineup was unnecessarily suggestive because made up of individuals twelve to sixteen years younger than suspect
lineup unduly suggestive where made up of individuals twelve to fifteen years younger than suspect
“The record at the time of mistrial strongly suggests concurrence in the trial judge’s action, and the events thereafter are consistent only with and confirm consent.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ogg, Froeb, Jacobson, Department

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.