State v. Kirkpatrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a trial court’s charge to the jury that a reasonable doubt is “one for which you could give a reason”
• noting a charge was not defective partly because it lacked \language found objectionable in the Manning case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Daniel
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2000-01-31· cited 408×
• State v. Needs
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-23· cited 76×
• State v. Whipple
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-07-01· cited 50×
• State v. McCraine
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-05-20· cited 36×
• State v. Woodruff
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-03-12· cited 25×
• State v. Pradubsri
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-07-19· cited 8×
• State v. Clute
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-04· cited 6×
• State v. Joseph M. Swaringen
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2025-04-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hoffman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-24· cited 90×
• State v. Manning
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-09· cited 50×
• State v. Foster
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-09-14· cited 28×
• State v. Culbreath
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-01-02· cited 25×
• Matthews v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-01-02· cited 25×
• State v. Grandy
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 25×
• State v. Hinson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-09-08· cited 14×
• State v. Boys
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-10-29· cited 5×