Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/10/2000
State v. Kinloch
Citations
- 526 S.E.2d 705
- 338 S.C. 385
- 2000 S.C. LEXIS 12
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding statement tending to expose declarant to criminal liability and offered to exculpate the accused is not admissible unless corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the statement was actually made
- “The rule does not require that the infoivnation within the statement be clearly corroborated, it means only that there be corroborating circumstances which clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement itself, i.e., that the statement was actually made.”
- stating “some effort at locating the witness is necessary”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-12-18· cited 92×
- State v. CopeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-08-28· cited 40×
- State v. WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-23· cited 28×
- State v. StatenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-07· cited 25×
- State v. TerrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-13· cited 14×
- State v. PrioleauCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-04-03· cited 4×
- Dodd v. BerlinskyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-08
- State v. Anthony AndersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-06-07
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonaldFourth Circuit· 1982-08-16· cited 146×
- United States v. William John BagleyFifth Circuit· 1976-08-16· cited 98×
- United States v. Yehuda DraimanSeventh Circuit· 1986-02-21· cited 90×
- United States v. Jerry Dale LoweFourth Circuit· 1995-09-20· cited 84×
- United States v. Thomas Edward Harty, Walter Lesczynski, Paul Dicaro, Michael GurgoneSeventh Circuit· 1991-04-26· cited 68×
- United States v. Christopher D. MacKeyFirst Circuit· 1997-07-09· cited 67×
- United States v. Daniel King Brainard, United States of America v. Halton Q. Bittick, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1983-01-13· cited 59×
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-15· cited 48×
- United States v. Roberto Salvador and Oscar SalvadorSecond Circuit· 1987-06-04· cited 46×
- State v. DoctorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-06· cited 25×
- State v. BrownNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-11-08· cited 19×
- State v. ForneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 19×
- State v. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1996-12-10· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.