Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/22/2019

State v. King

Citations

2019 Ohio 1492

Syllabus

Criminal Law—Felony Sentencing—R.C. 2929.12. The trial court did not err when it sentenced appellant to a mandatory six-year prison sentence because the court stated during the sentencing hearing and later incorporated in the sentencing entry its consideration of R.C. 2929.12 sentencing factors and the sentence was not otherwise contrary to law.

Judges: Ringland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Watkins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-25· cited 23×
State v. Motz
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-08· cited 22×
State v. Shiveley
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-14· cited 15×
State v. Arledge
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-05· cited 12×
State v. Bryars
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-22· cited 6×
State v. Martin
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-06· cited 2×
State v. Napier
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-02· cited 2×
State v. Spain
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-31· cited 1×
State v. White
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Crawford
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-29· cited 89×
State v. McGowan (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-05-17· cited 32×
State v. McGowan
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-05-17· cited 31×
State v. Van Tielen
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-28· cited 7×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.