State v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[A]ll witnesses testified that the assault occurred quickly, within a short span of time and, essentially, as one continuous act. There was no testimony elicited at trial that there was any temporal break between knife thrusts or distinguishing one thrust from another in any manner.’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rios
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-02-28· cited 16×
• State v. Gamer
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-08-05
• State v. James E.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-01-20
• State v. Urbanowski
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-03-01
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-05-03
• State v. Alicea
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-07-30
• King v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-09-24

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Chiarella v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 1,089×
• Dunn v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 482×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 108×
• Sekou v. Warden
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-25· cited 73×
• Neil R. Cola v. Charles H. Reardon, Sheriff of Essex County
  First Circuit· 1986-03-26· cited 53×
• State v. Robert H.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-08· cited 41×
• State v. Fernandez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1992-03-17· cited 37×
• State v. Mooney
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-02-13· cited 13×
• State v. Bjorklund
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-23· cited 12×
• State v. Gainey
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-09-01· cited 10×
• State v. McFarlane
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-05-17· cited 3×