Skip to main content
· 12/8/2008

Lancaster County Bar Ass'n v. South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense

Citations

  • 670 S.E.2d 371
  • 380 S.C. 219
  • 2008 S.C. LEXIS 356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in construing a statute, this Court will reject an interpretation which leads to an absurd result which could not have been intended by the General Assembly
  • “In construing a statute, this Court will reject an interpretation which leads to an absurd result that could not have been intended by the legislature.”
  • “In construing a statute, this Court will reject an interpretation when such an interpretation leads to an absurd result that could not have been intended by the legislature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Kittredge, Pleicones, Toal, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.