· 12/8/2008
Lancaster County Bar Ass'n v. South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense
Citations
- 670 S.E.2d 371
- 380 S.C. 219
- 2008 S.C. LEXIS 356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, in construing a statute, this Court will reject an interpretation which leads to an absurd result which could not have been intended by the General Assembly
- “In construing a statute, this Court will reject an interpretation which leads to an absurd result that could not have been intended by the legislature.”
- “In construing a statute, this Court will reject an interpretation when such an interpretation leads to an absurd result that could not have been intended by the legislature.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Kittredge, Pleicones, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.