Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 31 Fla. 207

Syllabus

<p>1. A charge that if the deceased was lawfully in possession of the house and premises when he was killed, and on which he was living at the time of the killing, he was as exempt from hostile intrusion, or from forcible or unlawful ejectment as if the place was his by fee simple title, and he has as good right to defend it from such intruder, even if that intruder claimed ownership of the property, as if the title was in him without dispute; does not assume tliat if the deceased was lawfully in possession of the house and premises the defendant was a hostile intruder with intent to forcibly and unlawfully eject the deceased. On the contrary, its propositions as to lawful possession and hostile and forcible intrusion and unlawful ejectment, are hypothetical.</p> <p>.2. A charge is not irrelevant when there is testimony to which it is applicable.</p> <p>3. Charging as to manslaughter in the second degree is immaterial to the defendant where there is a verdict of such manslaughter, and the testimony of the State clearly proves a higher degree of guilt, murder in the first degree, and it is apparent that the jury did not believe the testimony for the defense, which testimony, had the jury believed it, would have influenced a verdict of acquittal on the ground of self defense. Any error in the inapplicability of the charge to the case made by the testimony is harmless error,</p> <p>4. On an indictment for murder there may be a conviction of manslaughter in the second degree.</p> <p>5. The fact that the evidence would have sustained a verdict of murder in the first degree, does not render it insufficient to support a verdict of manslaughter in the second degree.</p> <p>6. Offenses committed prior to the Revised Statutes becoming operative, are still offenses under the statutes which punished them at the time of their commission. Such is the express purpose of Section 2853 of the Revision. Whether Section 32 of Article III of the Constitution inhibits a mitigation of pun

Judges: Raney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.