Supreme Court of Vermont· 11/1/1983
State v. Kerr
Citations
- 470 A.2d 670
- 143 Vt. 597
- 1983 Vt. LEXIS 574
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that statute prohibiting carrying dangerous or deadly weapon while committing felony does not require proof that defendant has knowingly carried deadly weapon
- concluding that statute prohibiting carrying dangerous or deadly weapon while committing felony does not require proof that defendant has knowingly carried deadly weapon
- concluding that circumstantial evidence \constitute[ed] sufficient evidence of guilty knowledge to sustain the verdict\
- explaining that this Court will not read language into statute unless necessary to make it effective
- noting statute must “be enforced as the legislature enacted it, according to its terms”
- declining to read mental state requirement into 13 V.S.A. § 4005, which prohibits carrying weapon while committing felony, where one was “simply not a part of the statute”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Billings, Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-01-13· cited 85×
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-03-22· cited 76×
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-08-14· cited 42×
- State v. DannSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-08-08· cited 41×
- In re B.R.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-04-25· cited 34×
- State v. MessierSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-07-19· cited 31×
- State v. WarnerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-28· cited 25×
- State v. DornSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-05-03· cited 23×
- State v. Kent Richland, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-09-18· cited 22×
- State v. VuleySupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-02-08· cited 19×
- State v. AudetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-01-15· cited 18×
- State v. ErwinSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-04-07· cited 17×
- State v. HurleySupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-06-24· cited 16×
- McAllister v. AVEMCO InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-05-08· cited 13×
- Curtis Hier v. Slate Valley Unified School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont· 2025-01-10· cited 13×
- State v. GadreaultSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-07-26· cited 12×
- State v. Robert WithamSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-05-06· cited 6×
- State v. HochSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-01-14· cited 5×
- In re Richard Bowen, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2021-02-12· cited 5×
- State v. BeresfordSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-04-12· cited 4×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 1,485×
- City of St. Paul v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-12-12· cited 90×
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-12-10· cited 66×
- State v. KasperSupreme Court of Vermont· 1979-04-05· cited 63×
- State v. BarrSupreme Court of Vermont· 1966-10-04· cited 31×
- State v. ShottonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-02-28· cited 25×
- State v. RathburnSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-11-03· cited 17×
- State v. ColbySupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-02-02· cited 15×
- State v. SavoSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-06-02· cited 12×
- State v. OldsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-02-02· cited 8×
- State v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont· 1965-02-02· cited 8×
- State v. RussoSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1974-05-28· cited 5×
- State v. DuboisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-01-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.