State v. Hoch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no Confrontation Clause violation despite witness having “testified prior to the admission of the videotape” because “defendant was entirely free to recall her to the stand for cross-examination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Iowa v. Demetrice De'angelo Tompkins
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2015-02-13· cited 105×
• State v. John Discola
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2018-01-19· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Herndon
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-08-26· cited 6×
• State v. Jason Robinson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2025-01-29
• State v. Dean A. Lovejoy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2026-06-18

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• State v. Gallagher
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-08-26· cited 50×
• State v. Kerr
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-11-01· cited 42×
• State v. Desautels
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-08-11· cited 32×
• State v. LaBounty
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-04-17· cited 27×
• State v. Wiley
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-02-02· cited 25×
• State v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2008-05-16· cited 22×
• State v. Squiers
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-03-24· cited 22×
• State v. Findlay
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-10-31· cited 17×
• State v. Spooner
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-08-13· cited 16×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2008-10-10· cited 15×
• State v. Blackburn
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-05-14· cited 13×