Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 552 P.2d 1059
  • 15 Wash. App. 716
  • 1976 Wash. App. LEXIS 1468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \CrR 4.7(a)(1)(v) requires the prosecution to reveal the existence and nature of tangible evidence intended for use at trial.\
  • “CrR 4.7(a)(l)(v) requires the prosecution to reveal the existence and nature of tangible evidence intended for use at trial.” (emphasis added)
  • failure to designate to whom the warrant should be returned is ministerial error
  • warrant failed to designate magistrate for return
  • warrant failed to designate a magistrate for return

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.