Skip to main content

State v. Kennedy

Citations

  • 229 W. Va. 756
  • 735 S.E.2d 905
  • 2012 W. Va. LEXIS 901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • viewing Williams, a fractured plurality opinion, “with caution” as “Williams cannot be fairly read to supplant the ‘primary purpose’ test previously endorsed by the Court”
  • “it may be fairly said that the issue of whether and to what extent an expert may rely upon and/or then disclose (even with a limiting instruction) as a predicate fact, testimonial hearsay, is unanswered by Williams”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Workman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.