Skip to main content

State v. Kelly

Citations

  • 295 Kan. 587
  • 285 P.3d 1026
  • 2012 WL 4466161
  • 2012 Kan. LEXIS 473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying holding in Bogguess to bench trial presided over by different judge than the motion to suppress
  • explaining the contemporaneous objection rule and finding that a pretrial ruling is not sufficient because the materiality of the proposed evidence may not become apparent until other evidence has been admitted
  • explaining the contemporaneous objection rule and finding that a pretrial ruling is not sufficient because the materiality of the proposed evidence may not become apparent until other evidence has been admitted
  • waiver of issue and preclusion of appellate review can occur by failure to raise issue before lower court, failure to raise issue in appellate brief, or failure to raise issue in petition for review
  • different judges presided over the hearings
  • different judges presiding over hearings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biles, Luckert, Moritz, Nuss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.