Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/11/1965
State v. Freeman
Citations
- 408 P.2d 612
- 195 Kan. 561
- 1965 Kan. LEXIS 470
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- K.S.A. 60-404 has a legitimate purpose for the appellate court, whose function is that of review rather than trial de novo.
- K.S.A. 60-404 has a legitimate purpose for the appellate court, whose function is that of review rather than trial de novo.
- “As a corollary to the [contemporaneous objection] rule, objections to the admissibility of evidence will not for the first time be considered on appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-01-21· cited 177×
- People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-12-23· cited 153×
- Richmond v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1976-10-08· cited 100×
- State v. FisherSupreme Court of Kansas· 1977-04-09· cited 79×
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1970-01-24· cited 62×
- State v. OswaldSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-07-14· cited 56×
- State v. SmolinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 53×
- State v. MilowSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-11-13· cited 39×
- State v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-05-10· cited 36×
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-12-09· cited 34×
- State v. PhinisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-07-12· cited 33×
- State v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1968-05-11· cited 33×
- State v. DonahueSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-07-14· cited 32×
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-09-28· cited 32×
- State v. FaidleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1969-01-25· cited 28×
- State v. ScheetzSupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-01-12· cited 28×
- State v. CantrellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1968-05-11· cited 26×
- Kansas Electric Supply Company, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. Dun and Bradstreet, Inc., a Delaware CorporationTenth Circuit· 1971-09-20· cited 25×
- State v. DarlingSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-11-05· cited 25×
- State v. HazeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-11-08· cited 25×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,121×
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 831×
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-08-05· cited 195×
- Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1961-09-28· cited 75×
- James L. Otney v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1965-01-26· cited 59×
- Latham v. CrouseTenth Circuit· 1963-07-10· cited 51×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas· 1964-07-14· cited 36×
- State v. StubbsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1965-11-06· cited 21×
- Powers v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1965-05-15· cited 17×
- Lopez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1964-01-20· cited 17×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1958-03-08· cited 16×
- State v. TramsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1962-03-03· cited 14×
- State v. MaloneSupreme Court of Kansas· 1965-04-10· cited 13×
- State v. NixonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1922-06-23· cited 11×
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1958-04-12· cited 10×
- Latham v. CrouseSupreme Court· 1963-12-16· cited 10×
- Aaron v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1962-10-08· cited 7×
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1964-11-07· cited 4×
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1947-10-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.