Washington Supreme Court· 12/5/2019

State v. Arndt

Citations

194 Wash. 2d 784
453 P.3d 696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that there was no Sixth Amendment violation when the defendant was still able to present a defense despite evidentiary exclusions
concluding that Arndt’s right to present a defense was not violated in a murder and arson case when only some of her proffered evidence was excluded and she was able to argue her defense theory
concluding that Arndt’s right to present a defense was not violated in a murder and arson case when only some of her proffered evidence was excluded and she was able to argue her defense theory to the jury
concluding that there was no violation of Arndt’s right to present a defense because Arndt was able to advance her defense theory 11 No. 80419-7-I/12 through the presentation of some, though not all, of her proposed supporting evidence
observing that the crimes of arson and first degree murder are set in different parts of the criminal code with different primary purposes
determining that the trial court did not violate the right to present a defense when the defendant was still able to advance her defense theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.