Skip to main content

State v. Kauffman

Citations

  • 170 N.E.3d 952
  • 2021 Ohio 1584

Syllabus

Robbery R.C. 2911.02(A)(3) guilty plea effect actual innocence Crim.R. 11 Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(b) prejudice nunc pro tunc firearm specifications. Affirmed appellant's conviction for robbery. Appellant's guilty plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered. The trial court did not completely fail to comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(b), the advisement regarding the effect of a guilty plea is not a constitutional requirement, and prejudice was not shown. The case was remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose issuing a nunc pro tunc entry to correct a clerical error and delete the firearm specifications from the sentencing entry.

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.