State v. Nowden

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 3554

Syllabus

Plea colloquy Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) maximum penalty knowing, intelligent, and voluntary consecutive sentence R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings. Appellant's convictions are affirmed. Appellant's pleas were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. During the plea colloquy, the trial court informed appellant of the maximum sentence and fine on each count, and appellant replied that he understood. The trial court was not required by Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) to inform appellant of the potential for discretionary consecutive sentencing. A review of the record reveals that the trial court made the required findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) before imposing consecutive sentences.