State v. Whaley
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 188
Syllabus
Crim.R. 11 knowingly intelligently voluntarily maximum penalty prejudice guilty plea felony. Defendant was not prejudiced by the court's inconsistent advisement of the maximum penalties he faced by entering guilty pleas to the felony offenses. Defendant's decision to enter pleas of guilty was predicated on his desire to accept the terms of a favorable plea agreement and not his alleged misunderstanding of the applicable penalties.
Judges: E.T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 403×
- Hayward v. Summa Health System/Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 86×
- State v. KauffmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-06· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.