State v. Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defense counsel argued for mitigation before sentencing and inter- rupted the court mid-sentencing, but never indicated that [the] defendant wished to be heard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zyst v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-12· cited 9×
• State v. Bishop
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-14· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cunningham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
• State v. Walker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-21· cited 81×
• State v. Simmons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-08-31· cited 12×
• State v. Fern
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 10×
• State v. Ross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-03-27· cited 6×
• State v. Cox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-11-22· cited 4×
• State v. Juarez-Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-07-17· cited 2×
• State v. Bishop
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-14· cited 1×