Skip to main content

State v. Jordan

Citations

  • 186 A.3d 1
  • 329 Conn. 272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘[t]he consti- tutional right to present a defense does not include the right to introduce any and all evidence claimed to support it’’
  • claim of improper exclusion of evidence of victim’s convictions not constitutional in nature when jury heard testimony that, if credited, would support theory of self-defense
  • in homicide or assault prosecution where defendant claims self-defense, defendant may introduce victim's convictions for crimes of violence to show that victim was first aggressor
  • claim of improper exclusion of evidence of victim’s convictions not consti- tutional in nature when jury heard testimony that, if credited, would support theory of self-defense
  • \we cannot say that a subsequent act of violence . . . could never be probative of whether the victim acted in conformity with that conduct during the charged incident\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.