Supreme Court of South Carolina· 5/9/1972
State v. Jordan
Citations
- 188 S.E.2d 780
- 258 S.C. 340
- 188 S.E.2d 180
- 1972 S.C. LEXIS 342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Appellant concedes that the action of bloodhounds which were placed on the supposed track of the offender is admissible as evidence provided that the dogs are allowed to follow their instincts free and untrampled by their handlers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Brailsford, Littlejohn, JJ'
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. NorwoodMichigan Court of Appeals· 1976-07-19· cited 25×
- State v. QuillienSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-13· cited 23×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-16· cited 19×
- State v. MeyersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-03-07· cited 16×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-09-03· cited 12×
- State v. EllisonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-09-21
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.