Supreme Court of South Carolina· 9/3/1975
State v. Jackson
Citations
- 217 S.E.2d 794
- 265 S.C. 278
- 1975 S.C. LEXIS 265
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding exclusive possession of items by accused is not required for such items to be admissible in armed robbery prosecution; the accused need only bear a distinctive relationship to the property
- holding exclusive possession of items by accused is not required for such items to be admissible in armed robbery prosecution; the accused need only bear a distinctive relationship to the property
- when part of a conversation is put into evidence, an adverse party is entitled to prove the remainder of the conversation, so long as it is relevant, particularly when it explains or gives new meaning to the part initially recited
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ness, Moss, Lewis, Bussey, Littlejohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TynerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-08-23· cited 69×
- Baine v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-06-10· cited 52×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 51×
- State v. Cabrera-PenaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-11-08· cited 29×
- State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-07-07· cited 27×
- State v. FultonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-23· cited 22×
- State v. PeayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-04· cited 17×
- State v. CarmackCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-05-24· cited 16×
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-01-27· cited 8×
- State v. Cabrera-PenaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 3×
- State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-04-05
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-06-12· cited 10×
- State v. LakeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-01-11· cited 10×
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-05-09· cited 7×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-11-06· cited 5×
- State v. LawhornSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-05-28· cited 3×
- State v. RainesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-12-27· cited 1×
- State v. MiokovichSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-11-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.