State v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the error in calculating the defendant’s presumptive sentence was harmless because the trial court imposed a concurrent sentence for the offense and the defendant had identified no other adverse consequences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dulfu
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-16· cited 7×
• State v. Mendoza-Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-04-11· cited 6×
• State v. Robintree
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-04-19· cited 4×
• Doe v. First Christian Church of The Dalles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-09-27· cited 4×
• State v. Freauff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-13· cited 1×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-24· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Titus
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 143×
• State v. Bucholz
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-08-05· cited 67×
• State v. Tremillion
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 18×
• State v. Witherspoon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-06· cited 18×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-08-07· cited 8×
• State v. Lopez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-30· cited 4×
• State v. Powell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-24· cited 3×
• State v. Diaz-Guillen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-17· cited 2×