State v. Tremillion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that error in imposing sentence of 15 to 18 months on one count was harmless given that the sentence was imposed concurrently to a 58-month sentence for another count, because the error could not affect the defendant’s actual period of imprisonment
• the existence of a concurrent sentence rendered harmless any error relating to the challenged sentence
• no remedial action is required when an erroneous sentence is imposed concurrently with a legally permissible sentence and “cannot affect defendant’s actual period of imprisonment”
• sentence of “15 to 18 months’ imprisonment” unlawfully indeterminate
• sentence of “15 to 18 months’ imprisonment” unlawfully indeterminate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).