Skip to main content

State v. Jones

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3050

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it overruled appellant's motion to suppress, as he was not unlawfully seized and voluntarily consented to DNA collection. The trial court also did not err when it overruled appellant's motion in limine seeking to exclude fingerprint evidence or when it did not give an Evid.R. 404(B) instruction, because he waived the arguments by not objecting at trial. Finally, the court did not err when it overruled appellant's motion for a mistrial because, if there was error, he invited it. Judgment affirmed. (Donovan, J., concurring in judgment only.)

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.