State v. Jones

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 303

Syllabus

Appellant's claim that his guilty plea to theft was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered lacks merit because, during the plea proceedings, the trial court properly notified Appellant of its authority to impose an additional, consecutive prison term as a judicial sanction for Appellant committing the theft offense while on post-release control. Appellant also failed to establish that the trial court committed plain error by failing to cite on the record the case number for which Appellant was placed on post-release control, and that post-release control was not properly imposed in the prior case. Judgment affirmed.