State v. Clark

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 2801

Syllabus

The trial court erred at sentencing in failing to provide appellant with statutorily-required notices under the Reagan Tokes Law. Although the trial court omitted a consecutive-sentence finding from three judgment entries, such findings were not required because appellant's sentence was an agreed sentence. The trial court did not commit reversible error by imposing prison sentences and no-contact orders where appellant had agreed to such orders in his plea agreement. Appellant's general dissatisfaction with the performance of his attorneys did not render his guilty pleas invalid. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for the sole purpose of resentencing in Montgomery C.P. Nos. 2020-CR-858 and 2020-CR-2828. Judgment affirmed in Montgomery C.P. Nos. 2019-CR-3891, 2020-CR-1372/2, 2020-CR-1936/2, 2020-CR-3096, and 2020-CR-3375.