State v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding \no meaningful difference between allowing an officer to testify directly that he does not believe the defendant and allowing the officer to testify that he told the defendant during questioning that he did not believe him\
• ‘We find no meaningful difference between allowing an officer to testify directly that he does not believe the defendant and allowing the officer to testify that he told the defendant during questioning that he did not believe him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Musser
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2013-07-12· cited 274×
• People v. Lopez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-07-28· cited 255×
• Davis v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2013-09-09· cited 198×
• Lanham v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2005-08-25· cited 101×
• State v. Willis
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-08-21· cited 19×
• Walter v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-11-02· cited 6×
• State v. Elnicki
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2003-12-31· cited 3×
• State v. Craycraft
  Clermont County Court of Common Pleas· 2008-03-06· cited 2×
• State Of Washington v. Ryan Effinger
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-06-15

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Young
  Second Circuit· 1984-09-17· cited 335×
• State v. Demery
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-09-13· cited 270×
• State v. Belgarde
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-05-26· cited 246×
• United States v. Enrique Espinosa
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-09-09· cited 226×
• United States v. Michael P. Fosher
  First Circuit· 1979-01-15· cited 128×
• State v. Suarez-Bravo
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-01-04· cited 38×