· 11/9/1989
State v. Prentiss
Citations
- 786 P.2d 932
- 163 Ariz. 81
- 48 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
- 1989 Ariz. LEXIS 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that “the executive branch has the power to decide what criminal charges to file”
- noting that time for prosecutor’s allegation was at the time of sentencing
- conditioning mitigation upon the prosecutor “alleging” certain statutory factors unconstitutionally encroached upon the sentencing discretion of the judiciary
- discussing separation of powers and noting that “courts as an institution are not involved in the wisdom of the legislation”
- striking unconstitutional language in a statute while upholding the remainder of the statute
- “Any rule which inhibits a lawyer at sentencing from revealing, recommending, alleging or discussing mitigating circumstances with that judge fosters injustice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Corcoran, Claborne, Ariz, Const
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.