Court of Appeals of Washington· 10/25/2007
State v. Johnston
Citations
- 143 Wash. App. 1
- 177 P.3d 1127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating courts begin with “a presumption in favor of the counsel of defendant’s choice”
- “in order to establish prejudice for the failure to effectively cross-examine a witness, the defendant must show 24 No. 83262-0-I/25 that the testimony that would have been elicited on cross-examination could have overcome the evidence against the defendant”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kulik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-07-16· cited 170×
- State v. RafayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-18· cited 125×
- State of Washington v. Bryan Jack Ross CrowCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-04-09· cited 97×
- State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-05-25· cited 72×
- State v. WEAVILLECourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-07-25· cited 48×
- State Of Washington, Res/cross-app. v. George Donald Hatt, Jr., App/cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-11-18· cited 31×
- State Of Washington, V. Timothy Forrest BassCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-08-16· cited 26×
- State of Washington v. Steven David StottsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-04-20· cited 22×
- State Of Washington, Resp/cross-app V. Justin Dominic Bell, App/cross-respCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-05-22· cited 17×
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-07-07· cited 14×
- State of Washington v. Michael Levi BackemeyerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-10-23· cited 12×
- State Of Washington, V. Stephen Wayne CanterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-06-01· cited 8×
- State v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-11-18· cited 1×
- State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-02-12· cited 1×
- In Re WiattCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-06-30
- State Of Washington v. Dennis Lawrence MccarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-11-19
- State Of Washington v. Chad Bruce OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-07-07
- State Of Washington, V Agyel Jumanne McdanielCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-18
- State Of Washington v. Greycloud LawlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-05-25
- State Of Washington v. Ryan EffingerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-06-15
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-04· cited 686×
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2004-11-04· cited 682×
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court· 1992-02-07· cited 447×
- State v. NoltieWashington Supreme Court· 1991-04-25· cited 279×
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 279×
- State v. VargaWashington Supreme Court· 2004-03-18· cited 246×
- State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court· 1992-06-11· cited 215×
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-04-03· cited 204×
- State v. McNealWashington Supreme Court· 2002-01-03· cited 177×
- State v. WittenbargerWashington Supreme Court· 1994-09-08· cited 162×
- State v. CienfuegosWashington Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 126×
- State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court· 1976-12-09· cited 89×
- State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-02-23· cited 73×
- State v. CantuWashington Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 72×
- State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-03-30· cited 61×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.