State of Washington v. Steven David Stotts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, under the plain error test, the error's prejudicial effect on the proceeding must have been \substantial and injurious\
• stating that an error must be clear or obvious in order to constitute plain error
• leaving that holding of Meléndez-Santana intact
• \We believe that this remedial regime provides adequate means for redress should the probation officer attempt to ride roughshod.\
• “the plain error test constitutes a mandatory limitation on a federal appellate court’s remedial authority”
• “a circumscription of the issues to be considered is well within the discretion of the en banc court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).