Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 1700

Syllabus

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – SPEEDY TRIAL – R.C. 2945.71: The trial court erred in dismissing the traffic charges against defendant on constitutional speedy-trial grounds, because the state's delay in serving defendant was not the result of a deliberate act, but was merely negligent—the state made initial efforts to serve defendant, including an attempt to serve defendant at an unrelated court proceeding, but thereafter, the state failed to act with reasonable diligence—and defendant failed to show particularized trial prejudice. Where the trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss on constitutional speedy-trial grounds, and the trial court did not make any findings or legal conclusions with regard to defendant's statutory speedy-trial argument, the cause must be remanded for the trial court to decide in the first instance whether defendant's statutory speedy-trial rights were violated.

Judges: Winkler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.